Friday, 30 March 2012

Toni Braxton- I Heart You Official Music Video Review



I have just seen the video to Toni Braxton's new music video and I had never fully heard the song until now and it is electro-pop, dance sort of song. The song is alright a little catchy. Lyrics are generic, repetitive and nothing really special.

The video looks very cheap and at the beginning with the white background and her straining her voice and I don't know if she is trying to prove she can sing but it wasn't good. At all. Then the actual song came on and it was plain, Lots of lights, the main guy as the DJ, breakdancers and then main male dancers. Then her posing and attempting to dance. It was unoriginal, recycled and boring video. From Unbreak my heart which was a classic and beautiful video to this horrid mess. Toni really.

Anyways, what made it worse was that stupid hat thing that she wore in a scene. That was just the end of it because how many people have that and their trying to be fierce or whatever it's over used, she could have worn a bin back and I would have been more amazed than that thing on her head.

Rant over, lool. Ermm, I think the only positive about that video was the guy....He was hot!!!!! Like, if I saw the video again it would be for him and that's it.

I know she is trying to stay relevant but it's just not working out. I am a fan of Toni Braxton and I don't just like one song by her but she was someone who came out with hit after hit after hit and her songs will always be amazing to me. That made me look up to her and how lame song after another.....It's very sad. I don't get why these artists just don't listen to their classics and then this new rubbish now and compare. Yes, it's not the same times or genre but the quality surely isn't the same. There are some amazing dance/pop/electro songs that I love but let's be real here. Rnb is surely dead.


Peep the Video Below:

Monday, 26 March 2012

The Voice UK Premiere Review

 I for one was looking forward to watching this new and fresh show as Last year Britain's got talent and X factor both lacked their x factor (Should I say.)From the beginning they sang "I got a filling," by black eye peas, which was alright. Then it was all explained. The judges sit on chair not facing contestant and then press the button if you like the voice......and soo on.
 
The first singer was average at best and it was shocking how they all were fighting for her like she had a Whitney Houston voice or something. On X factor....she wouldn't go far not because of her looks but because of her voice. 
 Then we had another woman who had lost her hair and it was a sob story and I feel for her but her voice wasn't great. It was average at best. I feel like I was waiting for her to belt out a big voice and amaze me but she didn't. It was so staged. Like they had seen the acts beforehand and they had to pretend it was their first time hearing them.


Then there an obese woman and man, who were also average at best. Would they go far on any other talent competition? NO! But they got through anyways. And their biggest reason for going on the voice was because they wouldn't be judged because of the way they looked and then they went to say. But I am fierce. An example of low self-esteem and a lack of talent. Look at Jonathan or Suboy.....He is obese but he has an amazing voice and whatever the person looks like the voice will just blow you away. I would buy his album because he has beautiful voice. Look at Adele. She made it and she is not a stick.


Moving on, the judges were....I can't find the word but it's not very nice. Will.I.AM he irks me and he raps and sings with autotune and his a judge. And he was just going on and on about I know this, I worked with Michael Jackson....Blah Blah Blah. And when he went on the stage with the first contestant  that was just stupid. Jessie j, I like her as an artist but I think it was just too much ego. Tom Jones is a legend but what did he bring to the show....Danny....meh.

The show was boring, not entertaining at all. After like 5/6 auditions the novelty of the chairs turning around and it being the person's choice. It gets boring. Especially  if the person’s singing was average to start with and when their preforming the crowd is shouting half the time and then zooming in to the family or friends and it all about the judges pushing the button than the actually performance and that process of pushing the button is very staged as their all talking to each other. It gets very boring after seeing it one or two times.

The sob stories OH MY GOODNESS.....We all have story to tell....shizz.

I switched over to Britain's got talent and what I found was I laughed so hard, the comedian is amazing. The contestants were great, even the bad ones made me laugh. It was entertaining and brilliant at the same time. Alesha was great, like a professional and David was soo funny. It was amazing and Simon. I like Simon, glad his back.

To end it all of, the voice uk should do open auditions and maybe they will actually find some real talent because these average pub/youtube and strictly come dancing singers are not superstars because they haven't been discovered or haven't gone for it. It's because their not good enough that's why their not superstars. Maybe if I was a music producer I would have found it great but it was a big disappointment to say the least.

Will I watch this again???

Never say Never but I won't be too quick to watch it. BBC really have wasted our money on this rubbish X factor carbon copy sob story junk.

Ratings:
 ITV show returns with 9.3 million viewers compared with BBC1 newcomer's 8.4 million,

Friday, 23 March 2012

Why Dieting will end up Making you Fatter than when you Started.

For years - decades, if you want to know the truth - I suffered from a fluctuating weight problem.
At first, the fluctuations were minor. In my teens, I veered from slim to slightly plump and back again. In my twenties, I went from slim to plump to podgy, and repeated the process. When I turned 30, I made a gargantuan effort to lose weight, and was slim for two years.
But then something happened; I lost control again, and my weight exploded. I was plump in no time, then frankly fat. It was horrible. And something, I knew, didn't quite make sense.
Of course, on one level, it made perfect sense. I was fat because I was greedy, or lazy, or both. To get technical, I was fat because I had disturbed my "calorie balance" - I had been consuming more calories than I'd been expending.
Conversely, when I lost weight, I had successfully reversed the process. But why, when I got fat again, was I always fatter than I'd been the time before? And why, when I got slimmer, was I never as slim as I'd been the time before?

In early 2003, I weighed about 240lb - at just over six feet tall, this made me close to obese.

I was, I could see, taking a similar trajectory, and at the same time, as Kirstie Alley, Sam Malone's love interest, Rebecca, in Cheers, who had been slim, and then plumpish, and was now gaining girth at a huge rate.

I wondered if there was any way back for Alley. There certainly didn't seem to be for other celebrities, such as Robbie Coltrane, Dawn French and Johnny Vegas. Were they stuck? Was I?

There comes a point when you lose heart - when a diet seems like the only answer. But could it be that dieting had made me fatter? Or, at the very least, that it had been a contributing factor?

According to research published by scientists from the University of California this week, the answer is: absolutely.

The Californian team analysed more than 30 studies of diets; one study found that a group of dieters ended up fatter than a control group who hadn't restricted their food at all.

One of the researchers, Dr Traci Mann, says: "You can initially lose 5-10 per cent of your weight on any number of diets. But after this honeymoon period, the weight comes back."

Over the years, I have tried just about every diet I could find. I started in the 1970s; low-carb diets had been popular, but low-fat was making a comeback. For a while, I trimmed fat off my steaks, and removed skin from chicken legs. I felt perky and trim.

Later, I did the F-Plan diet, which involves eating loads of fibre (it fills you up, but passes right through.)

Later still, I did the Hay diet, in which you avoid mixing carbohydrates and proteins.

Each diet seemed to be a trick to get you to consume fewer calories. And each diet worked - for a time. It felt great, to be fixing myself. And so quickly! But the overall problem was getting worse and worse.

There was a pattern - the process of getting fat was governed by a stronger force than the process of getting slim. Thinking about this, I remembered a book with the improbable title of Dieting Makes You Fat, written by Geoffrey Cannon and Hetty Einzig in 1983.

I'd flicked through this book in a bookshop during a slim period, and, for the 15 or 20 minutes I spent with the text, it seemed to make perfect sense. But it didn't stop me dieting.

When you begin a diet, you're never quite in your right mind. You feel fat, ashamed, desperate, and guilty. In this state of mind, punitive self-deprivation seems like a good remedy.

Years later, I read the book again, and again it made sense. "Dieting," said Cannon and Einzig, "creates the conditions it is meant to cure." When you diet, something funny happens to your metabolism - it gets better. Better, that is, at making you fat. To see why this should be the case, you have to think like a Darwinian.
Genetically, we are, to all intents and purposes, exactly the same as our Stone Age ancestors, who were threatened, above all, by starvation.

To survive, and reproduce, they had to have a metabolic system that would enable them to deal with periods of scarcity. And we, of course, are the same. Except we don't have periods of scarcity - we have diets.

What happens when the body is given less food than it needs? In the short term, it lives off its own reserves of fat. It gets thinner. But another mechanism comes into play: it also gets better at getting fat. When you diet, your mind wants to lose weight, but your body does not. When you diet, your body thinks you are unable to find food. You think: diet. Your body thinks: famine.

In the Stone Age, your fat-packing genes made you better at both survival and reproduction. Now, in this time of great abundance, they make you worse at both - more prone to heart attacks, and less attractive to the opposite sex.

And crucially, the more diets you go on - the more famines your body is exposed to, in other words - the better you become at getting fat.

What had happened to me, across the decades of dieting, was that I had developed a talent for getting fat.
Thinking about this in 2003, at my fattest, it all seemed logical. But still, I wasn't done with dieting. I decided to eat lots of protein and green vegetables, and cut down on carbs and sugar.

I thought I'd found the answer. I stopped eating pies, croissants, bagels, cakes and chocolates. Instead, I ate fish, chicken, steak and vegetables.

Did I lose weight? Sure. But then something weird happened. I started drinking heavily. Pretty soon, alcohol had replaced food as my big problem.

I thought I'd been unhappy because I was fat. It turned out that I'd got fat because I was unhappy. And now I was drunk for the same reason.

In the end, there are two important truths about diets. The first is that they can never work in the long term, which means that they can never work.

If you restrict calories, you'll just get better at getting fat. If you restrict unhealthy foods, and never eat them again, you might lose weight. But losing weight probably won't cure your real problems.

Just look at some people who have successfully lost weight: Lindsay Lohan, Nicole Richie, Victoria Beckham. Have they dealt with their real problems?

The other big truth about diets is this: they are hugely attractive because, on a diet, you don't have to confront your problems.

On one level, I love diets. I can't help myself. Neither can Kirstie. Just look at her now.
• 'The Hungry Years: Confessions of a Food Addict', by William Leith, is published by Bloomsbury, price £5.91.

Thursday, 22 March 2012

The Walking Dead - Season 2 Finale Review (Spoiler)

 If you haven't heard of, payed attention or tried out this show. Try it, but if you get scared really easily and are not into the supernatural shows then this might not be for you. Me personally I love those sort of things.

  SUMMERY
The world we knew is gone. An epidemic of apocalyptic proportions has swept the globe causing the dead to rise and feed on the living. In a matter of months society has crumbled. In a world ruled by the dead, we are forced to finally start living. Based on a comic book series of the same name by Robert Kirkman, this AMC project focuses on the world after a zombie apocalypse. The series follows a police officer, Rick Grimes, who wakes up from a coma to find the world ravaged with zombies. Looking for his family, he and a group of survivors attempt to battle against the zombies in order to stay alive. The Walking Dead is an epic, edge-of-your-seat drama where personal struggles are magnified against a backdrop of moment-to-moment survival. A survivalist story at its core, the series explores how the living are changed by the overwhelming realization that those who survive can be far more dangerous than the mindless walkers roaming the earth. They themselves have become the walking dead.
 ((SPOILERS)) 


I was a bit late with finding out about this amazing show and after I found about it, I tried the first episode it was a bit slow to start with but I carried on anyways and at the end of the first episode I was hooked and before I knew I was on season 2.

I watched “Shaun of the Dead” and for me it wasn't great but this is different and it has more drama and also zombies as well. I am surprised that these zombies are quite quick on their feet and they usually win because of their numbers.

The first season was brilliant, loads of drama, expositions, action, deaths and zombies (a.k.a. walkers) then the second season has been fewer walkers and more about relationships and little scenarios. It was still great; I think it was more for us to get to know the characters.

Firstly, let’s talk about Rick:

I like Rick and I think he makes a good leader from being the last person to join the gang and being the leader it's crazy. Yes, he finally killed Shane, which I must admit was great to watch and done well. But that speech at the end was needed, Lori is something else...I will get to her.

Then we have Shane:
At first I liked him but then he got crazy and then I stopped liking him. That is your best friend and to me that was what I saw, the friend who brought flowers and basically stopped Rick from being killed or eaten. I thought he cared about Rick but the second he got back it was like I wish you had died. Anyways, Shane gets alone with Rick to plan to kill him but ends up getting stabbed which was right. But he turns into a Walker, which from the spoilers of the people who have read the comic is because the airborne, the air infected.

Lets talk about Lori:
Don't like her at all, how in world can you tell your husband kill him, (basically) and then when he actually does it you are mad at him....Reallly. She cheated, which is her fault. She is having a baby which she doesn't know who the father is....Boyyyy, ain't that crazy. Plus, she doesn't really do much than clean and cook and then she has a go at Andrea.

Glenn:
I like Glenn and I think his cute and it's nice that there is a new romance there hopefully, he won't die. LOL


Andrea
She has grown in this season, she lost her sister and wanted to kill herself but now she is a bad-ass and I give it to her so surviving and killing all those walkers Lori would have died long time ago. But there is a mystery with who saved her that mysterious person is B-A with the walkers chained on her and everything. Can't wait for season 3 to find out who that was.



Season 3 will be back on Fall, cannot wait. One of the best if not the best TV show out now. Hopefully, it will just get better. 

Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Brandy, Monica - It All Belongs to me - Official Music Video Review

A new video of the famous rnb collabo of Brandy and Monica has just been released. Honestly, when I first heard the song I think it's alright. I am not in love with it and it's like cereal music that people will soon get over quickly.

I have loved Brandy from "Moesha," all the way to her music in th 90's and I am a huge fan but this song is just average and it has no life. From the lyrics that are plain and boring to the beat that....Im looking for the right word. Dry. I don't know and their vocals are not too great. Just saying. The video is done well and it's a good visual. Done very well.
I do have to say that their chemistry together is beautiful to see. 

Peep the Video Below:


If I compare this to Boy is Mine, Boy is mine is on another level. The beat was crazy, the video was different and funny. The lyrics and their vocals complimented eachother very well. I am listening to this classic now and it still sounds amazing.

Peep the Video Below:

One Third of Graduates on Low Skilled Jobs

More than a third of recent graduates who have found a job are doing ‘low skilled’ work such as being a cleaner or a postman, official figures revealed today.

The figures, from the Office for National Statistics, highlight the nightmare facing graduates who are struggling to get a decent job at a time or rising unemployment.

In 2001, just 26.7 per cent of recent graduates, who had left university within the last six years and found a job, were doing ‘low skilled’ jobs.

These include being a hotel porter, a catering assistant, a driver, a carer, a shop assistant, a secretary, as well as a cleaner or a postman.
 
By 2011, the figure had jumped to 35.9 per cent, which means more than one in three graduates with a job are doing one which they could have got if they had left school at 16.

If these are the prospects of geting a Degree then is it worth it when going leaves you with a huge debt and earning low skilled jobs that you would have earned anyways. 

Tanya de Grunwald, founder of Graduate Fog, the careers website for university leavers, said she hears from graduates who are ‘desperately struggling to find work’ every day.

She said: ‘Some even delete their degree from their CV to boost their chances of getting jobs in pubs and cafes.

‘Most are searching high and low and would take anything that was offered to them.

‘More often than not, employers do not even bother to write and tell them they had not got the job. They simply never hear back.’


Miss de Grunwald added: ‘We must ask whether it is right that schools, politicians and universities are still urging so many people to do a degree when many will later discover it was not a wise investment for them.’ 

It will fuel major concerns among parents and their children about whether a degree is worthwhile at a time when students starting university will leave with debts of up to £50,000.

While many of their parents enjoyed a free university education, their children who will start this autumn are facing tuition fees of up to £9,000 a year.
It also raises serious doubts about Labour’s famous pledge to get 50 per cent of school leavers to go to university.

But does one not go to university because there are no oppotunities. People should go to university to learn and enjoy what their learning. But doing a degree like Art or history will not increase your chances of getting a decent job. 

The problem will become that no one will want to do a degree and will only be left with unemployed people because all the low-skilled jobs are gone and all the skilled graduates are emigrating to other places of the world were they can get a job. Hence the debts won't get paid back. 

How did it get so bad. At one point an education was the way to make something of yourself but now that is not even available.